Saturday, May 31, 2008

Fast Food


I usually dont post anything thats not related to the Lower Mainland region of B.C but this I thought was interesting. This map here shows where in the U.S they have the largest concentration of fastfood restauraunts http://www.fastfoodmaps.com/static.html.. largely on the east coast. The city with the highest concentration of fast food is Oklahoma City according to Fortune Magazine.
This of course is not good for the health of the region and shows that its more than likely a car dependant region as well. The fattest city in America is now Houston Texas, while the fittest is Seattle WA.
For the Canadian Version the fattest Canadian city is
1). St Catherines ON
2).Regina SK
3). Saint John NB
4). Windsor ON
5).London ON
The fittest city in Canada which i was able to find is Victoria BC.

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

The Trials of Tinseltown


Tinseltown has been around for how many years now? I cant remember either but its fairly new( give or take 6-8 years ago?) . In this span of time the majority of people who go in there go for strictly the movie theatre. Besides that theatre there is the 7eleven and many other shops including the food fair but it has really never tooken off as a centre for people to gather and shop. Perhaps by 2010 that may change with more demand and less space in the city but it makes you question why it has taken a long time for it not to turn into a central shopping place.


Here are my theories


1). The neighbourhood surrounding it prevents it from turning into something more than just a movie theatre for the time being (i.e perhaps lack of other businesses or residents, although condos keep growing out of that neighbourhood every week it seems), close to DTES and Chinatown which already provides many amenities for people.


2). Bad business plan, whichever developer and marketer who created tinseltown failed to create a certain "niche" for it perhaps.

3). People dont like going inside malls anymore...they like shopping outside into different stores..malls can be full of anxiety and depressing and gives it a suburban feel.


what are your thoughts?

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Walmart Coming to Vancouver


Although it was widely protested by residents and the city council of 2002-2005 the proposed Wal Mart on Marine Drive it has been announced that they are coming to the current Costco facility on Grandview Hwy and that Costco will move to Burnaby. There does not need to be council approval because there is no zoning change as opposed to the Marine Drive location. The Grandview neighbourhood is right by a highway with people coming from the suburbs and with many big box stores it is not the most liveable area and is very car dependant, adding a Walmart just adds to the suburban feel of it with the already existing Roots outlet store, Rona and Superstore. This will be the first Walmart opening in Vancouver not in the region however as surrounding suburbs already showcase this big box store. It will be interesting to see if residents in this neighbourhood protest against this development, which is unlikely due to the amount of bigbox stores already in this part of town however there will be many who will refuse to shop here no matter what.

Whats your opinion?

http://www.canada.com/vancouvercourier/news/story.html?id=8982168d-2eb0-4c8d-9621-53c0ac4224df

Thursday, May 8, 2008

"the new downtown" in Surrey


I think its great that Surrey is going to have its own urban villa(downtown) like we've got in Vancouver. Its good for the environment as people in the South of Fraser can commute to somewhere much closer and it brings new oppurtunities of prosperity to that region increasing residential and especially commercial space. It will give Surrey more of a spirit of a city as it is welcoming 1,000 new people to the city every month. Its key to make their developments mixed use and in walking distance. Surrey has some of the weakest transit service in the region and needs to ramped up.


From BC Local News:

Surrey's urban heart will be upgraded to the status of Metro Vancouver's second downtown in the new regional growth strategy.
That's one of the changes now emerging as politicians fine-tune the draft of the plan to guide growth to 2031, replacing the old Livable Region Strategic Plan.
Instead of being one of eight "regional town centres" marked with circles, the new map shows Surrey's City Centre area at the end of the SkyTrain as "Surrey Metro Centre" with a slightly smaller square than the one marked "Metro Core" in downtown Vancouver.
"We're recognizing Surrey's aspirations to establish a town centre that will be a focal point for the Fraser Valley," explained Burnaby Mayor Derek Corrigan, who chairs Metro's land use and transportation committee.
Corrigan said it's important the ambitious vision for Surrey as a new Metro core be realized, noting it's the region's second biggest city and destined to become the biggest.
"We can't continue to have people commuting into the core of the city and into Burnaby and New Westminster for their jobs," he added. "We have to establish a job centre in the Fraser Valley that will avoid that kind of commute."
Surrey Mayor Dianne Watts welcomes the change.
"It gives us the opportunity to be a significant city centre for the entire region that includes office towers, highrises and high density, coupled with cultural facilities," she said.
Rapid transit extensions that will fan out from Surrey's core will make the area a major transportation hub, Watts said, noting city hall may also move there.
The other regional town centres in Burnaby, Richmond, New Westminster, North Vancouver, Coquitlam, Maple Ridge and Langley City remain the same and will now be known as regional city centres.
But the 12 smaller designated municipal town centres – which include areas like Ladner, Port Moody, Guildford, White Rock and Aldergrove – are slated to grow to 16, with additions recognizing Surrey's Cloverdale area, Lynn Valley in North Vancouver, South Vancouver near 49th and Main, and northwest Langley Township near the 200 Street corridor.
The urban centres are to be the focus for jobs, services and high-density housing.
But in addition to those areas, the plan calls for heavy growth in Surrey, Vancouver, Coquitlam and Langley Township.
That's where most of the region's "priority development areas" are to be designated, mostly along corridors planned for frequent transit.
Gone is the old concept of "growth concentration areas" that the former Livable Region Strategic Plan set to focus high-density growth.
Much of the changes are being driven by the province's recently unveiled vision for transit expansion.
Metro's new plan will assume ramped up transit in traditionally underserved eastern areas of Metro Vancouver.
"Communities are very focused on the issues of climate change and peak oil," Corrigan said. "There's more recognition growth has to be intensive and it has to be transit served."
He stresses the new growth strategy is still a draft and won't likely go to public comment before fall or be adopted until after the November elections.
"We're not carving this onto one of the pyramids yet."
Land use committee members reviewed the latest progress at a May 2 meeting.
The draft had tentatively proposed to create separate zones for agricultural and rural areas, removing them from the current Green Zone, which also includes parks, watersheds and sensitive areas.
But some directors feared that gave the appearance of gutting the current Green Zone and giving the green light to rampant development in previously protected areas.
"There was no intent to delete agricultural land from the Green Zone," Corrigan said, adding the Green Zone has become such a recognizable "branding" the region can't risk sending the wrong signal.
Now staff will designate rural and agricultural sub-designations under the umbrella of the Green Zone.
The bigger issue is what pieces of land will come out of the Green Zone – cities like Maple Ridge have long argued lands were mistakenly included when the LRSP was created in 1996.
Cities are being asked to put all their proposed changes to the Green Zone on the table to be considered all at once this fall.
The changes would be part of the final growth strategy that would be an issue in civic elections this fall before going to a vote of city councils.
There's cautious optimism a new regional consensus will be reached to approve the new plan.
A new amending formula would require a two-thirds board vote to allow boundary changes such as land removals from the Green Zone or agricultural zone.
The Green Zone and its goal of protecting natural areas isn't the only part of the old LRSP that is being maintained.
The draft continues the old core strategies to concentrate growth, improve transportation choice and allow for mixed-use complete communities where more people can live, work and play without long commutes.
But now added is a key goal of supporting sustainable economic growth, a major gap in the old plan.
Also expected are policies to promote greenhouse gas reductions and energy efficiency.
Food security will be listed as a "key challenge" in the new plan and expanded policies are to be put in place to protect food-producing lands.
"There will be continued pressure, parcel by parcel, to expand the urban footprint," a Metro Vancouver staff report cautions.
But it argues growth can be accommodated within areas already designated for urban use.
An industrial land area is also proposed that officials hope will help stem the conversion of those areas to condos or other uses.



Wednesday, May 7, 2008

COSTCO Downtown


The Costco that is across from GM Place is only the second Downtown costco in North America #2 from San Francisco. There are also condos on top of the Costco developnment, having a bigbox in a downtown right by skytrain with a condo development on top is a pretty good mix of urban development in my view and just being walking distance from Gastown and yaletown adds to the appeal. It gives people in downtown an excellent oppurunity to buy bulk foods..considering so far the choices are Safeway,Capers, Urban Fare, IGA,smaller stores etc.